timber wrote:What brand sealant do you use? With pitted and rough surfaces, I would be a little weary of using just sealant, but I am willing to try. Cutting my own gaskets is a pain but the template someone made in an earlier thread is paying dividends.
I use Permatex Ultra Gray silicone. If you are using the silicone it is an overkill to put the gasket also. It won’t hurt. The beauty of the silicone is that it will cover some of the imperfections of the matting surfaces.
timber wrote:…Then I took the water pump off. See the picture. Lots of corrosion but the actual pump looks good, I think. No play and it is greased, plus I can see what looks like the shinney bearing race so I think it is not original. I did not see a grease fitting. I think I read in another thread that the earlier models (pre '74?) had a grease fitting.
Reference the picture, why is the the circular outlet (inlet?) on the front of the engine blocked by the plate that is between the water pump and the front of the engine? Doesn't seem logical....
Around 74 I think, the water pumps changed the design a bit, with a sealed for life bearing. That’s the one you are looking. I think is a better design and last a lot longer, Specially the seal is better.
Regarding the outlet of the engine, not matching what you see on the pump, you’re not the first to be surprised by that, but it is like that. You’ll probably see a small hole (~1/4”) in the pump cover in that area. Not sure why they designed like that.
timber wrote:Reference the picture of the lower thermostat housing, why is there a stud and a bolt instead of two bolts attaching the lower thermostat housing to the front of the engine? Not a big deal, but again it doesn't seem logical...
Previous owner probably lost one of the studs and installed a bolt.
timber wrote:Reference the picture of the weighted valve at the bottom of the exhaust manifold, this contraption is to enable the engine to warm up quicker, right? Obviously, mine is broken; it moves freely without the spring. When I get the exhaust fixed where the manifold attaches to the exhaust pipe, should I try to fix this weighted spring valve thing? The few times I have driven the truck here in Georgia, it has been "cold blooded" even with temperatures in the 60"s and 70's. I think the exhaust should flow out unimpeded.
That spring is actually a bimetallic spring, that expands or contracts with temperature, allowing movement of the weighted valve. Unfortunately, it is unobtanium. In my case, it broke decades ago, and the hole for the axle of the valve enlarged a little, and small backfiring developed. I welded shut the hole, with the valve inside in the hot position. A pity but I had no choice.
timber wrote:Reference the carburetor picture, the circled item is the choke, right? It should be controlled with a cable from the driver dash, right? I like having a manual choke. There seems to be a lot of linkage from the pedal to the carb where play can develop. Is there a smarter (a cable?) way of linking to the carb?
The choke is indeed controlled by a wire from the panel. Regarding play of the linkage, the design is way better than having just a wire through a sleeve. The weakest link is the plastic rod part where a lot of play develops over time. I might have that plastic part. I used to own a 74 way back then. But if you’re considering a new carburetor, you’ll need to work this part of the linkage anyway.
Probably all of us can relate to your frustration regarding some workmanship done in the past, like missing washers, and others.