This is readable, but the image quality isn't the best. I had it scanned by the Australian National Library.
3 page article about the Patrol. Cover is included. I also have the whole issue as a separate file if anyone is interested. Gotta love the article on the cover, "How safe is your semen?" Can't say i ever gave it any thought, lol.
Australian Country Magazine 08/1976
-
- You know you own a Patrol when…

- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:52 pm
- Location: Phoenix AZ
- Location: phoenix, AZ
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
- Contact:
Australian Country Magazine 08/1976
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
1966 L60 Patrol
"Hey, watch this...!"
-probably what my last words will be.
"Hey, watch this...!"
-probably what my last words will be.
- You know you own a Patrol when…

- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:45 pm
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
- Location: Martinez California
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
- Contact:
Re: Australian Country Magazine 08/1976
Wonder what Esteban will have to say about the parking brake comments!

- Patrol Fanatic!

- Posts: 3005
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:28 am
- Location: Lutherville, MD
- Location: Lutherville, MD
- Has thanked: 6022 times
- Been thanked: 1603 times
Re: Australian Country Magazine 08/1976
Steve, thanks a lot for all your effort in putting all these gems! Very interesting reading.
There are some comments, that I certainly do not agree, like this one:
Mud: average, traction only. It is not able to cover the same type of ground as the Cruiser but the powerful engine will save the day once its old fashioned torque characteristics are mastered.
I've always laughed when standard equipped Patrols and Land Cruisers are compared, specially of the same wheelbase. I've never driven a Cruiser in those conditions, but, if they weigh the same, have basically the same wheelbase and track, engine, then how on earth can they differ?
My brother in law used to have a Cruiser, and obviously, was always bragging about it. One day he pointed me one key difference that in his opinion, made the Cruiser better in harsh terrain: the lack of sway bars! Maybe, there's a point to that. But easily corrected.
I think I should start this conversation in the "Bull session"...
Excellent Mike. I had a good laugh reading that part. I think this is a good article by the author, mostly unbiased, and with good observations.miksum56 wrote:Wonder what Esteban will have to say about the parking brake comments!![]()
![]()
There are some comments, that I certainly do not agree, like this one:
Mud: average, traction only. It is not able to cover the same type of ground as the Cruiser but the powerful engine will save the day once its old fashioned torque characteristics are mastered.
I've always laughed when standard equipped Patrols and Land Cruisers are compared, specially of the same wheelbase. I've never driven a Cruiser in those conditions, but, if they weigh the same, have basically the same wheelbase and track, engine, then how on earth can they differ?
My brother in law used to have a Cruiser, and obviously, was always bragging about it. One day he pointed me one key difference that in his opinion, made the Cruiser better in harsh terrain: the lack of sway bars! Maybe, there's a point to that. But easily corrected.
I think I should start this conversation in the "Bull session"...
Owner of the same Patrol since 1967